Pesticide poisoning as an occupational and environmentally determined disease: modern approaches to diagnosis in accordance with the recommendations of the International Labour Organization (part II)

  • Authors: A.V. Basanets, Т.О. Yastrub
  • UDC: 632.154:615.099:613.62
  • DOI: 10.33273/2663-4570-2026-100-1-48-67
Download attachments:

L.I. Medved’s Research Center of Preventive Toxicology, Food and Chemical Safety, Ministry of Health, Ukraine (State Enterprise), Kyiv, Ukraine

 

ABSTRACT. In recent years, there has been a global increase in the use of pesticides across various sectors of the economy. According to the World Health Organization, the number of acute occupational pesticide poisonings worldwide is steadily rising, especially in developing countries, and amounts to approximately 25 million cases annually. In Ukraine, within the structure of occupational diseases, cases of pesticide poisoning are sporadic and account for less than 0.2 %, indicating an imperfect system of diagnosis and registration of such pathologies, which requires improvement and adaptation to European requirements and recommendations.

Aim. To summarize international requirements for the recognition of workplace pesticide poisoning and to assess the compliance of the national system for diagnosing and recognizing occupational and environmentally determined pesticide poisonings with the recommendations of the International Labour Organization.

Materials and Methods. A scientific analysis of regulatory documents of Ukraine and the International Labour Organization concerning the diagnosis and establishment of the link between pesticide-related poisonings and working conditions. An analytical review of scientific publications using abstract databases of scientific libraries such as PubMed, Medline, and full-text databases of scientific publishers including PubMed Central, BMJ Group, and other VIP databases relevant to the research topic.

Results. Occupational pesticide poisoning is a major component of the consequences of pesticide exposure worldwide. The recommendations of the International Labour Organization (2022) regarding the establishment of a causal relationship between pesticide exposure and the development of occupational diseases were analysed. International approaches to determining the toxicological profiles of major pesticide groups, assessing clinical manifestations of acute and chronic exposure effects, and diagnostic criteria for poisonings associated with occupational use of organochlorine and chlorophenoxy pesticides, herbicides, paraquat, coumarin derivatives, and pentachlorophenol are presented. The issue of carcinogenic effects of pesticide exposure among workers is also considered. International approaches to the implementation of preventive measures for occupational pesticide poisoning are summarized.

Conclusions. Acute pesticide poisoning and chronic effects of pesticide exposure remain a persistent global public health problem. In Ukraine, such poisonings have accounted for less than 0.2% of occupational diseases in recent years, indicating shortcomings in the system of diagnosis and registration. In the context of Ukraine’s reintegration processes and accession to the European Union, the system for recognition, registration, and accounting of occupational and environmentally determined diseases, along with its legislative and methodological framework, must be adapted to international requirements and recommendations.

Key words: pesticides, occupational poisoning, environmentally determined diseases, list of occupational diseases.

 

СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ / REFERENCES

 

1. World Health Organization, International Labour Organization. WHO/ILO joint estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury, 2000–2016 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO, ILO; 2021 Sep 17. Available: https://www.ilo.org/publications/whoilo-joint-estimateswork-related-burden-disease-and-injury-2000-2016-0.

2. International Labour Organization. ILO OSH report 2024: ensuring safety and health at work in a changing climate [Internet]. Geneva: ILO; 2024 Apr. Available: https://www.ilo.org.

3. Boedeker W, Watts M, Clausing P, Marquez E. The global distribution of acute unintentional pesticide poisoning: estimations based on a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1875. DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09939-0.

4. United Nations General Assembly. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. 2017 Jan 24. Report No.: A/HRC/34/48. Available: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org.

5. United Nations Environment Programme. Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its fourth session. Geneva: UNEP; 2015. Report No.: SAICM/ICCM.4/15. Available: https://www.saicm.org.

6. Eddleston M, Nagami H, Lin CY, Davis ML, Chang SS. Pesticide use, agricultural outputs, and pesticide poisoning deaths in Japan. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022;60(8):933–41. DOI:10.1080/15563650.2022.2064868.

7. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr, Bailey JE, Ford M. 2012 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 30th annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013;51(10):949–1229. DOI:10.3109/15563650.2013.863906.

8. Lee WJ, Cha ES, Park J, Ko Y, Kim HJ, Kim J. Incidence of acute occupational pesticide poisoning among male farmers in South Korea. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(9):799–807. DOI:10.1002/ajim.22024/

9. Jørs E, Neupane D, London L. Pesticide poisonings in low- and middle-income countries. Environ Health Insights. 2018;12:1178630217750876. DOI:10.1177/1178630217750876.

10. Проданчук МГ, Басанець АВ, Гашинова КЮ, Кравчук ОП, Гвоздецький ВА. Аналіз динаміки професійної захворюваності та її наслідків в Україні у порівнянні з країнами світу. Медичні перспективи. 2023;28(3):137–52. DOI:10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289217 [Prodanchuk MG, Basanets AV, Hashynova KY, Kravchuk OP, Gvozdetsky VA. Analysis of the dynamics of occupational morbidity and its consequences in Ukraine in comparison with countries of the world. Medical Perspectives. 2023;28(3):137–52. DOI:10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289217].

11. Nahorna AM. Medico-social and demographic characteristics of the formation of occupational morbidity in Ukraine in the pre-war period and during martial law. Ukr J Occup Health. 2022;18(3):171–80. DOI:10.33573/ujoh2022.03.

12. Нагорна АМ, Медведовська НВ, Басанець АВ, Стовбан ІВ. Стан професійного здоров’я населення в Україні в мирний і воєнний час. Сімейна медицина. Європейські практики. 2025;3:46–51. DOI:10.30841/2786-720X.3.2025.339889 [Nagorna AM, Medvedovska NV, Basanets AV, Stovban IV. The state of occupational health of the population in Ukraine in peace and wartime. Family Medicine. European Practices. 2025;3:46–51. DOI:10.30841/2786-720X.3.2025.339889].

13. Кабінет Міністрів України. Постанова № 1662 від 08.11.2000 «Про затвердження переліку професійних захворювань» [Internet]. Available: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1662-2000. [Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution No. 1662 of 08.11.2000 “On Approval of the List of Occupational Diseases” [Internet]. Available: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1662-2000].

14. International Labour Organization. Diagnostic and exposure criteria for occupational diseases – guidance notes [Internet]. Available: https://www.ilo.org.

15. Zhang P, Wang J, Sweetman A, Ge L, Xing R, Ji H, et al. An overview on the legacy and risks of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorinated pesticides in the polar regions. Mar Pollut Bull. 2024;209(Pt A):117042. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117042.

16. Helou K, Harmouche-Karaki M, Karake S, Narbonne JF. A review of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in Lebanon: environmental and human contaminants. Chemosphere. 2019;231:357–68. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.109.

17. Androutsopoulos VP, Hernandez AF, Liesivuori J, Tsatsakis AM. A mechanistic overview of health associated effects of low levels of organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticides. Toxicology. 2013;307:89– 94. DOI:10.1016/j.tox.2012.09.011.

18. Parrales-Macias V, Michel PP, Tourville A, RaismanVozari R, Haïk S, Hunot S, et al. The pesticide chlordecone promotes parkinsonism-like neurodegeneration. Cells. 2023;12(9):1336. DOI: 10.3390/cells12091336.

19. Bradberry SM, Watt BE, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA. Mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and management of acute chlorophenoxy herbicide poisoning: a review. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2000;38(2):111–22. DOI: 10.1081/clt-100100925.

20. Bertero A, Chiari M, Vitale N, Zanoni M, Faggionato E, Biancardi, et al. Types of pesticides involved in domestic and wild animal poisoning in Italy. Sci Total Environ. 2020;10:707:136129. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136129.

21. Antonangeli LM, Kenzhebekova S, Colosio C. Neurobehavioral Effects of Low-Dose Chronic Exposure to Insecticides: A Review Toxics. 2023;11(2):192. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11020192.

22. Santana MR, Venegas LZ, Corral S, Roeleveld N, Groenewoud H, Van der Velden K, et al. Reduced neurobehavioral functioning in agricultural workers and rural inhabitants exposed to pesticides in northern Chile and its association with blood biomarkers inhibition. Environ Health. 2020;19(1):84. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-020-00634-6.

23. Pannu AK, Saroch A, Agrawal J, Sharma N. 2,4-D poisoning: a review with illustration of two cases. Trop Doct. 2018;48(4):366–8. DOI: 10.1177/0049475518786834.

24. Azazh A. Case series of 2,4-D poisoning in Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital. Ethiop Med J. 2010;48(3):243–6. Available: PMID: 21073086.

25. Demissie Z, Bekele A, Bane A. A Case of Severe 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Poisoning Causing Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges. Int Med Case Rep J. 2022;15:389–92. DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S375882.

26. Gawarammana IB, Buckley NA. Medical management of paraquat ingestion. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 72(5): 745–57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04026.x.

27. Chandra A, Shah KA, Mahato S, Bhattacharjee MS, Mandal T. Paraquat poisoning. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(11):e246585. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-246585.

28. Eason CT; Wickstrom M. “Anticoagulant Poisons” in: Vertebrate pesticide toxicology manual (poisons). Information on poisons used in New Zealand as vertebrate pesticides. Dept. of Conservation Technical Series 23. New Zealand Department of Conservation. Available: https://goo.gl/1N6QYr.

29. Ng WY, Ching CK, Chong YK, Ng SW, Cheung WL, Mak TWL. Retrospective Study of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant-Type Rodenticide Poisoning in Hong Kong. J Med Toxicol. 2018;14(3):218–28. DOI: 10.1007/s13181-018-0660-x.

30. Freixo A, Lopes L, Carvalho M, Araújo F. Superwarfarine Poisoning. Acta Med Port. 2015;28(3):389–92. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26421794/.

31. Edgerton TR, Moseman RF. Determination of pentachlorophenol in urine: the importance of hydrolysis. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1979;27:197–9. DOI: 10.1021/jf60221a001.

32. Proudfoot AT. Pentachlorophenol poisoning. Toxicol Rev. 2003;22(1):3–11. DOI: 10.2165/00139709-200322010-00002.

33. Williams PL. Pentachlorophenol, an assessment of the occupational hazard. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982;43(11):799–810. DOI: 10.1080/15298668291410602.

34. Vakonaki E, Androutsopoulos VP, Liesivuori J, Tsatsakis AM, Spandidos DA. Pesticides and oncogenic modulation. Toxicology. 2013;10:307:42–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.01.008.

35. Sadighara P, Mahmudiono T, Marufi N, Yazdanfar N, Fakhri Y, Rikabadi AK, et al. Residues of carcinogenic pesticides in food: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health. 2023;39(4):659–66. DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2022-0253.

36. Nicolis I, Curis E, Deschamps P, Bénazeth S. Arsenite medicinal use, metabolism, pharmacokinetics and monitoring in human hair. Biochimie. 2009;91(10): 1260–7. DOI: 10.1016 /j.biochi.2009.06.003.

37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2007. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. Available: https://goo.gl/2KiEqE.

38. Baselt R. Disposition of toxic drugs and chemicals in man. 8th ed. Foster City (CA): Biomedical Publications; 2008. p. 106–10, 1197–1200. Available: https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910080975102121.

39. Balmes JR, Speizer FE. Chapter 256. Occupational and environmental Lung Disease. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine.18th Edition.

40. Dich J, Zahm SH, Hanberg A, Adami HO. Pesticides and cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8(3):420–43. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018413522959.

41. Barthel E. Increased risk of lung cancer in pesticideexposed male agricultural workers. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1981;8(5–6):1027–40. DOI: 10.1080/15287398109530135.

42. Lundehn J, Westphal D, Kieczka H. Uniform principles for safeguarding the health of applicators of plant protection products. Mitt Biol Bundesanstalt Land-Forstwirtsch. 1992;227:60–112.

43. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 1997. OCDE/GD(97)148 – Guidance Document for the Conduct of Studies of Occupational Exposure to Pesticides During Agricultural Application. Available: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2002/05/guidance-document-for-the-conduct-of-studies-of-occupational-exposure-to-pesticidesduring-agriculturalapplication_g1gh2b45/9789264078079-en.pdf.

44. World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, 2004. IPCS Harmonization Project – IPCS Glossary of Key Exposure Assessment Terminology – Definition of Acceptable Daily Intake. Available: https://goo.gl/HfExtf.

45. Council Directive 97/57/EC of 22 September 1997 establishing Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC (replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009) – Definition of Acceptable Operator Exposure Level. Available: https://goo.gl/mTk8Vp.

 

Received February, 5, 2025

Review dates February, 19, 2026; February, 24, 2026

Publication date June, 12, 2026